SOUND & FURY: Pacquiao-Clottey Afterthoughts, A Talent For Disappearing, Woeful Undercards, Jim Lampley Stricken by Brain Fever, Telefutura Returns to the Scene of the Crime & TCS Offers to Fact Check for Boxingscene.com

AUTHOR: | IN: Boxing | COMMENTS: 7 Comments |

Manny Pacquiao v Joshua Clottey

Not many thought Joshua Clottey, who used the “hide in plain sight” strategy against Manny Pacquiao in Dallas, Texas, would score an upset over the best fighter in the world, but his meek performance certainly puts to rest his chances of ever being considered an elite boxer. He simply does not have the psychological make-up to beat the very best fighters. Clottey, who appeared fearful of getting countered, did not use his jab, barely bothered doubling his left hook, and rarely threw his right uppercut. It is difficult to say when Clottey first decided to slip into survival mode, but his negative body language between rounds after the fourth seems as good a place to start as any. Clottey simply shook his head “no” when Lenny De Jesus implored him to take risks and relied instead on his talent for disappearing. And this despite the fact that Clottey landed several jarring uppercuts on the inside and the occasional straight right. Despite his performance, or lack of one, Bob Arum will recycle him again soon. Now it is up to the public to collectively shake its head whenever Clottey steps into the ring again.

*****

As for Pacquiao, he wanted war and Clottey wanted detente. Under those circumstances, there was really nothing Pacquiao, usually excitement personified, could do. He looked as fast as ever and showed the discipline to stick with the game plan as outlined by Freddie Roach. Pacquiao threw decoy punches to the head in order to get Clottey to raise his elbows, and thumped hard shots to the body when Clottey obliged. The right hooks he landed with regularity were brutal, but Clottey would not give up on his obsessive mission: to hear the final bell at all costs.

*****

The undercard that supported the Pacquiao-Clottey fight was wretched even by Top Rank standards. Not only were the matchups dreadful on paper, but they also featured fighters going absolutely nowhere. Shot Jose Luis Castillo, weathered David Diaz, jaded John Duddy, anonymous Michael Medina (whose previous fight had been against an opponent with 49 losses), and a clubfighter, Alfonso Gomez. Only Humberto Soto can be considered a fighter who might be involved in significant bouts in the future. Castillo, Diaz (a hardworking fighter and seemingly one of the nicest guys in boxing), Duddy, and Gomez were unlikely to be on HBO any time soon before “The Event.” So, what exactly was the point behind these fights? If you ask someone like Ron Borges, whose opinion sways according to whomever he is interviewing at the moment, then Top Rank is “marketing” its fighters. Bob Arum certainly has done a wonderful job “building up” fights. Take, for example, his proposed Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.-John Duddy bout. Top Rank has marketed this fight by showcasing his dynamic duo in two excruciatingly dull bouts against nobodies on huge pay-per-view events. Chavez Jr. even saw his boring “W” against Troy Rowland turn into a no-contest after failing his post-fight drug test. Now millions of people have seen how boring and limited Duddy and Chavez Jr. are. On the other hand, because Duddy can be whipped on any given day by anybody with a pulse, it makes all the sense in the world to put him in a fight for a decent paycheck. From that point of view, then, Arum is doing him a serious favor, and if he brings Chavez Jr.-Duddy to Texas, he will certainly wind up in the black because of the large Mexican fan base to draw from. Still, the idea that Arum is “marketing” some of his fighters well by putting them in dull fights against less than ordinary pugs seems awfully silly.

*****

Nothing maligned Gus Johnson has done on Showtime compares to the foolishness Jim Lampley unleashed on the world during the Pacquiao-Clottey bout. His “Bang! Bang!” routine is the boxing equivalent of the Howard Dean shriek. Lampley has the kind of reputation common in boxing: earned easily or not at all. After all, when there are only three or for regular blow-by-blow announcers in the sport, it might not be so hard to make it as “#1.” For years, Lampley has been openly rooting for certain fighters, embellishing the action on the screen, and oftentimes, just plain old making things up. But his performance on Saturday night was beyond the pale. Lampley, who became momentarily unhinged during the Pacquiao-Clottey snoozer–sounded like a crystal meth freak on the mic. Like other hams on the HBO broadcast team–and in the boxing media in general–Lampley wants to be the center of attention as much as possible, and the boring main event unfolding in Cowboys Stadium was depriving his ego of an opportunity to flex on the air. So Lampley simply became a broadcast vigilante and took matters into his own hands.

*****

Readers of The Cruelest Sport know that the boxing media is an easy target for criticism due to its lack of ethics, its dearth of analytical thought, its cheerleading, its purple prose, and its outright stupidity, but BoxingScene.com has transcended its own lowly standards by not only printing pieces by a promoter (Frank Warren) grinding dull axes, but by not bothering to fact check the garbage they post. Warren recently wrote that female boxer Rita Figueroa “died recently as a result of a KO in November last year.” Figueroa, who suffered a subdural hematoma during a bout against Kita Watkins, underwent surgery and is now on the way to recovery. “My team,” she recently told the Los Angeles Times, “I gotta tell you, my team is the reason I’m sitting here talking to you right now.” That Warren made such an outrageous howler is one thing, but for boxingscene.com to print it without correction proves that they do not read what they post. Well, The Cruelest Sport volunteers to fact check, for free, the articles posted on boxingscene.com, that way, at least one website will have some sort of standards. (This offer does not apply to articles written by Lyle Fitzsimmons. That task requires compensation.)

*****

Now that Telefutura is back in the boxing business, everyone can turn cartwheels simultaneously. Thank goodness we will all have the opportunity to see even more mismatches than ever, and, as an added bonus, in Spanish only broadcasts. Not long ago The Cruelest Sport conducted an informal study of televised boxing in 2010 for The Boxing Bulletin and found out that 95% of the bouts are basically predetermined. Here are a few updated figures: out of roughly 50 bouts aired on ESPN2, Showtime, HBO, and FSN/Fox en Espanol so far this year, only three have been upsets. And those “surprises” have been relatively low-profile bouts: Brinkley-Stevens, Rosado-Roman, and Mepranum-Marquez. This means that 94 percent of all televised boxing matches end up as planned. There is no reason to believe, other than blind faith, of course, that fights on Telefutura, delivered exclusively by Golden Boy Promotions, will be any different. Hooray!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I am beginning to thing TCS is in the witness protection program, given the number of times you have moved. I have too many "dead links" to the TCS site. Need to do some clean up on my browser's favorites listing

Comparing the Lampley meltdown to the Howard Dean shriek. Classic. Or how about the infamous Jessica Savtich NBC news digest http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr8AExHciBE

I do believe that many years ago, when Lampley was first starting out as one of the first sideline reporters for college football on ABC (before that became the exclusive realm of hot looking females), that there WAS an incident involving certain substances. More of the Bolivian variety, rather than the choice of the trailer park population-- some of who probably write copy for Boxing Scene.

As for the boxing, compared to the many nuthuggers pro and con, I like to think I can be objective on Pac. But there was absolutely NOTHING to be added to his legacy by that fiasco Saturday night (through no fault of his own) when Clottey didnt show up at all. 1200 punches against an inanimate object I guess means something but not a lot. And maybe we can read something into the fact that Cotto didn't strike that fear into Clottey. But this one will be completely forgotten twenty years from now when we look back at Pac. Next.

Hi WF,

welcome back...I haven't moved since December, but I won't argue that TCS is not some sort of dead link...

Poor Jessica Savitch. But, as you probably remember, you don't have to go that far out of boxing for similar shenanigans...I remember the clearly inebriated Frank DeFord "hosting" a few pay-per-views in the late 1990s, with Collins glass in hand. Only in this sport can a man who admits freely that he hates boxing ("I despise boxing...") be hired as a broadcaster...

As far as Pacquiao goes, it's true, not many are going to remember the Clottey Two-step--except for its Cowboys Stadium setting--but he never stopped fighting hard and Clottey never stopped doing his imitation of one of those Pillow People from the 1980s...In the end, it's just a line of type in the record books....Let's see what Bob Arum conjures up for Pacquiao in the future....

Well Los, I didn't jinx your over/under bet afterall. That card was dreadful, and I can't help but feel cheated out of $50...even though I buy into the fact that I'm getting the chance to watch something special when Pacquiao fights. I don't really question that Clottey is wired to lose and employs the Sitzkrieg, but you got to hand it to Pacquiao for trying. 1200 punches or whatever is damn impressive, but at that level if someone decides he simply doesn't want to get KO'd, it's a hard thing to do. Pac's willingness to stand in the fire to get his blows in is admirable.

"Broadcast vigilante" is pretty good! I like that one. That Bang thing was truly one of the more bizarre things I've ever heard during a fight. Crazy form of Tourettes or something.

Not as excited as most seem to be about the Telefura thing as most seem to be. And Golden Boy just doesn't inspire confidence.

Anyway, hope you're well man, I missed a lot of good stuff since I last checked in

Hi JPF,

thanks for checking in. This is why you want to have a decent scrap or two on the undercard...If the main event doesn't hold up, you can at least say "But the fight between so and so was really good!" But no, we can't have that. Instead we have to be the guinea pigs for Bob Arum's bizarre lab experiments....According to CompuBox, Pacquiao only landed 20% of his shots...if Clottey doesn't feel like getting hit too much, he won't....

Lampley used to be pretty good, but at a certain point, everyone in this business (except the fighters, for the most part) becomes an egomaniac and he's no different. He just wanted to be the center of attention and found the dopiest way to do it....

As for Telefutura, every now and then Golden Boy seems to be satisfied with a small profit on an event-by-event basis and puts on a decent club show for it's own sake. Hopefully, they'll do that once in a while on Telefutura, otherwise they should just call their show "Future Champions Beat Up Cristian Favela."

Yeah, man, you miss a lot of carnage on TCS when you go on strike....

"Bang, bang, bang, bang! BANG!!! BANG!!! BANG!!! Try and stop it! BANG!!! BANG!!! Here I come! BANG!!! You wanna throw sometime!? BANG!!! You wanna throw back!? BANG!!! Keep comin'!" - Jim Lampley

Hi TAllagash,

Thanks for writing. I hear you about watching a decent bout regardless of the bona fides of its participants, but this was on a pricey PPV with lots of pre-fight hype. 85% of boxing matches are made solely to advance the promoter's agenda and Saturday night was a clear case of that...It's just a question of matchmaking for a big event...for 100K more, Top Rank could have put on a much more exciting show...not necessarily featuring Kelly Pavlik as the chief support, for example, but putting in some younger, hungrier, more exciting boxers in there.

To be honest, by the time Soto-Diaz came around, I was already in a stupor brought on by boredom, but it seemed to me that Soto was on autopilot and that Diaz was just not talented enough to do anything about it. This seemed underscored by the constant handshakes and hugs shared between the two during the fight....It's always good to see veteran fighters get paid, however...

Lampley, to me, is a symbol of all the egos outside of the ropes constantly vying for attention at the expense of the fighters and the spectators...he used to be a professional on ABC and now he's morphed into, as you say, the crazy uncle....

I don't follow MMA much, but I'm aware of the UFC's reputation for filling cards top to bottom....no promoter in boxing will ever get a similar rep...the last one to have that kind of rep was Don King, whose early 1990s shows now look legendary...

Like you say, you need to entertained and casual boxing fans are going to say --and have said- -that the Pacquiao-Clottey show was awful....

call me a guy who likes to watch a decent bout, regardless of future/title ramifications, but i liked the diaz/soto bout.
less than super talented guys, but i appreciated soto's sticking to the sweet science over the course of the fight. i'm normally the first to blast boxing for terrible undercards on a thus highly overpriced PPV during a RECESSION, but everyone is really harping on that fight as well as the others. i agree castillo vs gomez was ****.

lampley is what you get.. knocking that guy is like knocking your crazy uncle at the reunion...every year, every event, things get uncomfortable when he's around. it's just how it is. lampley and merchant were like the off kilter uncles from whichever side of the family you always secretly laughed.

boxing purists hate on mma, but i can't remember the last UFC that charged that much for an event...and virtually showed 1 fight that beforehand you could even say semi-mattered.

it's sports, combat sports even...but still entertainment.