I hear you. I wasn’t exactly apologizing, I just want to put it out there that this particular “writer” was picked randomly. In fact, 9 out of 10 times, the first article I click on is worth including on “Your Experts At Work!”

Thanks for the kind words about TCS; I appreciate them.

Honestly, I don’t think you have to explain yourself or apologize for anything. There should be standards when it comes to boxing journalism, and I was just pointing out that that writer is consistently not very good. But you are right that articles like that serve as an example of a greater problem in boxing.

I’m a big fan of this site and your work, and I really like that you’re one of the few boxing writers who seems immune to hype and gross exaggeration.

thanks for checking in. I don’t mean to pick on anyone in particular, it’s just I randomly clicked on that article and it struck me as being indicative of the kind of crap out there on a regular basis regarding boxing. I make mistakes here, of course, and there have been typos, etc., but that Breakdown of War thing was unreadable trash (not the worst stuff I’ve read, though!). To me, it was merely symbolic of boxing coverage in general.